Hydraulic permeability of SiN-NP wafer #'s 1029 and 1030 with "clean" water

Sarah, Tejas, and I bought some “Invitrogen Ultrapure DI water” from the medical center to see if we would find a different permeability using the clean water vs the water from the Barnstead.

Sarah and I repeated our permeability tests but made sure to measure the flow rate for the first 100 uL.  We got the following plots for wafers 1019, 1029 and 1030.  The measured permeabilities for the first 100 uL were:

1019 F – 0.626  cc/cm2/s/bar

1019 G – 0.234  cc/cm2/s/bar

1019 I – 0.789  cc/cm2/s/bar

1029 clean A – 2.415  cc/cm2/s/bar

1030 clean A – 5.368  cc/cm2/s/bar

Even with the “ultrapure” water, we are seeing the permeability decrease with time.  We are also seeing inconsistent permeability as more water is passed.  I don’t have a great idea on quantifying this behavior other than showing the plots below, but I would warn anyone trying to measure changes is flow rate to keep in mind that total volume passed may also alter the flow rate on top of any other parameters.

Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.12.08 PM
starting “reverse”
Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.12.33 PM
Starting “reverse”
Starting "forward"
Starting “forward”

 

Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.13.17 PM

 

Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.13.03 PM

Similar Posts