Continuing my work from last week, Tucker used the same tenting (NPN, vapor transfer) and incubation procedure (20 nm and 60 nm Au particles) on an oxide substrate with posts (200 nm high). The substrate was dessicated in the 70C oven overnight. No additional platinum or gold coatings were made. The sample was tilted slightly on the SEM stub, so I used a tilt compensation of 10 degrees to keep everything in focus.
Image without tilt compensation. The items are blurry in the top portion of the image.Oxide patterned region with tented membrane over posts. The tented region consists of rings around each post. Some of the rings have an interesting high contrast pattern on them.Freestanding region tented pillars are on the right, and tented regions over the substrate are on the left. Some have high contrast, which is most likely a residue from drying or potentially particles stuck underneath. There are a few small salt crystals (cubes lower left) in the image.60 nm Au aggregates on top of a tented region.There are many holes, but no single 60 nm Au particle could fit through any of them.Small 25 nm particle near hole.Tented pillar region over substrate.
Magnified view of this pillar with large nanoparticles on top of the tent, and smaller ones occupying the holes.
Next, we will have to break the nanomembrane tent and see if we can observe particulate on the bottom surface.
Update 6/25/15 – We broke the tent
No metallization yet, just scratched the tweezers across the surface.
Large scale particulates (60 nm aggregate) are mostly in place)Broken post. The tented radius is about 1.5 microns.Broken area near post, which would have been under tent. Nanoparticles near bottom part of imageDistance to particles
Particles are about the right size.
I’m going to metallize with platinum to get clearer images.
I’ve run a few comparative studies with the CytoVu devices that have SiO2 membranes in them. From a previous NRG discussion, here is the comparison of a single location with only the fluorescent images, and that same location but with phase included: In the phase image, the pores can be seen through the cells, especially evident in…
Now that we have preliminary transport data from the Tecan, we need standard curves in order to get permeability coefficients. This is really tricky because the RFU (relative fluorescent units) are arbitrary and based on the Tecan gain. For example, a solution of 10uM rhodamine might be 5000 RFU with a gain of 80 but…
I took a closer look at some of Lingyun’s samples today, and captured some interesting TEM images. wafer 205 with 10 nm Ti @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti @ 250kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 200kx The higher mag….
Following images show the diffusion profile of rhodamine across pncSi as observed in the timelapse movies. Looking at the profiles no significant difference is observed between the non RTPed and RTPed samples. Non RTP sample: RTP sample:
BBB Device Update We’ve identified a few areas in which we can improve upon the initial device seen in Booth et al (2012). Mainly: Endothelial TEER increases to an in vivo value, hopefully from increased astrocytic (pericytic?) support from the abluminal chamber due to better membrane characteristics. Real-time microscopy of endothelial cell tight-junctions under the…
We have already established that bias is an important parameter in controlling the morphology of 15 nm thick pnc-Si, but have yet to look at its effect on thicker films. This week, made a few 30 nm thick Si films with 02, 05, 25, and 50 W of substrate bias. I annealed these films at…