Endothelial cell attachment to porous substrates via focal adhesions is initially affected by pore spacing and not absolute porosity. Maturation of endothelial monolayers via cell-cell interactions occurred over the same time course regardless of substrate porosity, pore size and contact area. Cell-matrix interactions at maturity were dictated by substrate stiffness.
Data
Fig. 1 SEM images of 0.5 mm and 3.0 mm pore size membranes. Spacing between pores is one pore diameter. Porosity for both membranes is 22.7%.
Fig. 2 Cell attachment to substrates through focal adhesions at 24 hours. HUVEC were cultured on tissue culture plastic (TCP), non-porous, 3.0 µm high porosity, 0.5 µm high porosity SiO2 membranes, and stiff (E = 2 MPa), and soft PDMS (E = 5kPa). Cells were stained with DAPI (nuclei, blue), phalloidin (actin filaments, green), and anti-vinculin (focal adhesion vinculin, red).
Fig. 3 Quantification of focal adhesion formation. Formation of distinct focal adhesions was quantified for all substrates – number of focal adhesions per cell and percent of cells with distinct focal adhesions. Error bars are +/- SD. Sample size >50 for each substrate.
[missing figure]
Fig. 4 Endothelial Barrier Maturity. HUVEC were cultured to form a monolayer on tissue culture plastic (TCP), non-porous, 3.0 µm high porosity, 0.5 µm high porosity SiO2 membranes, and stiff (E = 2 MPa), and soft PDMS (E = 5kPa). Cells were stained with DAPI (nuclei, blue), anti-VE-cadherin (cell-cell junctions, green), and anti-vinculin (focal adhesions, red) to visualize formation of endothelial barriers.
Fig. 5 High-resolution fluorescence image of focal adhesion formation on 3.0 µm pore size SiO2 membranes upon reaching confluence. White circles are locations of pores. Solid circles are locations where focal adhesions (vinculin, red) are present over the pore or at the pore edge.
Supplemental Data
Fig. S1 Cell Spread Area at 24 hrs. HUVEC spread area was quantified 24 hrs post-seeding on TCP, non-porous SiO2 membranes, 3.0 µm pore size SiO2, 0.5 µm pore size SiO2, stiff PDMS (E = 2 MPa), and soft PDMS (E = 5kPa). The box plots represent median and IQR of spread area. Whiskers are +/- 1.5IQR.
Hi all – I finished my 10 months internship with Sartorius on 16th of July and since all my results are going to be the third and last aim of my Ph. D., I will be presenting my results in our NRG meeting. Since these results are confidential, I am not allowed to publish them…
Introduction Aline and SiMPore are producing devices at much higher manufacturing rates than we were capable of in the McGrath lab. In order to verify that these manufactured devices are capable of growing cells and allowing for cell survival, live/dead assays were performed on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) grown 48 hours on either…
I’m not sure how many people in the current group have read all the papers that we have published, but a critical one was a JACS paper from Shigeru Amemiya where he used his Scanning ElectroChemical Microscopy (SECM) to probe the permeability of our membranes at the micron scale. In the supplement to this paper,…
I took a closer look at some of Lingyun’s samples today, and captured some interesting TEM images. wafer 205 with 10 nm Ti @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti @ 250kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 200kx The higher mag….
Here’s a cropped image from a recent TEM pic that Brian McIntyre took of our material for SiMPore (15 nm thickness, not sure what wafer). This particular feature caught my eye because the crystal is perfectly aligned so we are looking at individual atomic columns of Si, instead of the typical crystal planes. These happen…
Just an update on the closed flow systems I put together yesterday using vacuum grease. Even with the vacuum grease at the point of entrance of the capillary tube to the PDMS-pncSi system the PDMS was able to get into the trough of the membrane chip. I will talk with Henry today to see what…
Anticipating the eventual introduction of nanoporous SiO2 can we call non-porous SiO2 something other than np-SiO2?