W565 Air Permeability and Burst Pressure

I tested four samples (-1,1); (-1,2); (-1,3); and (-2,4) for air permeability and burst pressure. The first three samples showed no measurable air permeability for three attempts each. The sample from position (-2,4) did have a very small air permeability of 11.2 cc/(cm2*atm). Based on the results of rhodamine diffusion it seems odd that I did not see more air permeability. TEM images should clarify the situation.

The burst pressures are shown below.

These burst pressures are certainly high, the two rightmost burst pressures had to be estimated using the N2 tank output pressure gauge as the pressure exceeded the max for the manometer.

Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. Wow! I don’t know what is going on with this new process but this seems like a very important advance.

  2. I’m concerned about the weakness in the center. Is this a consistent trend, based on past data?

    Theoretically, the 1×10 and 1×20 slits should have comparable burst strength. The fact that there is only 1 slit is probably more important, but these do appear to be much stronger membranes than previously made. Porous versions and amorphous versions should be measured ASAP. (the amorphous versions have no holes, so only burst pressure needs to be measured).

  3. The burst pressure pattern seen in this test is not a trend that I have seen while I have been here. The most typical result I have observed is constant burst pressure independent of position.

Comments are closed.