Purpose: To investigate the formation of focal adhesions (FAs) on various cell culture substrates, including TCP, SiO2 membranes, and PDMS membranes.
Background: FAs are large macromolecular assemblies through which mechanical force and regulatory signals are transmitted between the extracellular matrix (ECM) and an interacting cell. FAs consist of a complex network of ECM, membranes, and cytoplasmic components at which endothelial cells (ECs) adhere to ECM proteins or the cell culture substrate. One cytoplasmic component of FAs is vinculin, a structural molecule that is concentrated on the cytoplasmic side of the FA and aids in attachment of actin filaments to the plasma membrane. Stiff, non-compliant 2D cell culture substrates promote the formation of distinct stress fibers and, subsequently, FAs. Cells fully embedded inside 3D matrices do not readily form FAs.
Methods:
Substrates included TCP with or without a 1% Geltrex coating, in duplicate. A retention gasket was used for ease analysis. Three identical plates were created for analysis at 3 timepoints, 4 hours, 24 hours, and 72 hours. HUVEC were grown to confluence, passaged, and seeded at a density of 5000 cells/cm^2.
Plates were stained with Phalloidin and Vinculin Ab and then imaged at their respective timepoints.
Staining Protocol:
1. Wash with PBS (1x)
2. Fix with 3.7% Formaldehyde in PBS (RT, 15 min)
3. Wash with PBS (1x)
4. Permeabilize with 0.1% TX-100 in PBS (RT, 3 min)
5. Wash with PBS (2x)
6. Block with 1% BSA in PBS (RT, 15 min)
7. Wash with PBS (2x)
8. Stain with 1uL phalloidin in 200uL PBS (RT, 15 min)
9. Wash with PBS (2x)
10. Stain with 1uL Vinculin Ab in 100uL PBS (Varying incubation time)
11. Wash with PBS (3x, leave last wash in)
Vinculin Incubation:
Plate V2: RT, 1 hour
Plate V3 & V4: 4C, 2 hour, well flooded with 300uL PBS after 1 hour to curb evaporation.
Imaging:
Wells imaged using the fluorescent channels GFP (300ms) and TxRed (500ms), as well as phase contrast (20ms). Images captured using 10x, 20x, 40x, 63x. Vinculin staining captured most distinctly using the 40x and 63x objectives, as shown below.
Results:
Plate V2, 4 hours:
TCP with Geltrex, 40xTCP with Geltrex, 63xTCP without Geltrex, 40xTCP without Geltrex, 63x
Plate V3, 24 hours:
TCP with Geltrex, 40x
TCP without Geltrex, 40xTCP without Geltrex, 63x
Plate V4, 72 hours:
TCP with Geltrex, 40xTCP with Geltrex, 63xTCP without Geltrex, 40xTCP without Geltrex, 63x
Conclusions: HUVEC seemed to be less dense and less spread on a majority of the TCP without geltrex, with respect to the HUVEC cultured on TCP with geltrex. Cells that are less spread have less distinct actin stress fibers and subsequently less FAs marked by vinculin. For spread cells on both substrate conditions, vinculin can be observed in both the perinuclear region and at the termination points of actin stress fibers. We do not yet have a quantitative method for measuring the prevalence of FAs. Yet, from qualitative observation, I would conclude that presence of FAs is dependent on the ability of cells to adhere to and spread on a substrate. For the TCP with geltrex, the substrate was coated with a layer of basement membrane proteins. These proteins assist the HUVEC in attaching to the surface, and may have led to the cells increasing their spread area and developing distinct actin stress fibers. For the TCP without geltrex, even though the HUVEC were cultured on a flat substrate that is optimized for cell culture, the substrate was void of basement membrane proteins, making adhesion and spreading more difficult for the cells.
Future Experiments: Currently in the process of repeating this experiment on SiO2 and PDMS membranes. As previously explained, literature states that cells grown in 3D environments should not form FAs. We often compare our SiO2 membranes to 3D cultures because cells are exposed to media on both sides of the membrane. However, previous experiments have shown that cells do form distinct actin stress fibers on the SiO2 membranes. Therefore, I hypothesize that the HUVEC will form FAs on the SiO2 membranes.
In a first attempt to reduce the electrostatic drag that might be slowing water transport, I ran an experiment with 1x PBS. The membranes were first ozone treated and then assembled into the SepCon inserts. From these first trials, it appears that PBS does pass through more quickly than DI water.
Introduction The Slide Body (Figure 1) has been used for a long time to image μSiM devices. This slide body has the same footprint as a traditional microscope slide but is designed to hold up to 2 μSim devices for imaging. The device has an open center with thin ledges where the edges of the…
Bernhard Group: Discoloration was observed during DNA separation experiments. Further study led to these results: No discoloration observed with low pH buffered NaCl. Discoloration with high pH buffered NaCl. Worried that Cl was the culprit, sodium acetate was tested. Discoloration observed with sodium acetate. In one early experiment, 4 areas were tested on one chip. …
I wanted to do some more fluroescent imaging in transwells to look into background fluroescence. This was mainly motivated by my inital study. These are HUVECs stained with 5uM CMFDA and 10uM Hoechst 33342, fixed in formaldehyde and imaged on the Zeiss at 10X. This was 6 hours after seeding. Before acquiring the images, I…
I’m currently trying to compare separations between different complex protein mixture. This was my first crack at depleted human serum. This mixture has been processed so that the most common blood proteins (such as albumin and immunoglobulins) have been removed. All three trials were performed using membranes from w338 in diffusion mode. 338 has a…
Separations were performed at 2 different salt concentrations with equal volume filtrate and retentate (to avoid dilution problem). Separation time was 40hrs rather than the usual 24. The lower salt concentration run has a lower cutoff – which is just like what we see in the DNA separations. Remember though that proteins have different charges…
