Skip to content

Nanomembrane Research Group

  • Home
  • Publications
  • MembranesExpand
    • Common Chip Formats
    • Common Membranes
    • Microslit Membranes
  • DevicesExpand
    • µSiMExpand
      • Geometry
      • µSiM CAD Files
      • AssemblyExpand
        • Protocols.io (µSiM Assembly)
        • Instructions
        • Common Issues and Troubleshooting Tips
      • Cell Culture ProtocolsExpand
        • Top Well: hCMEC/D3
        • Top Well: HUVEC
        • Bottom Channel Culturing
        • Immunocytochemistry Protocol
        • Impact of Chip Orientation on Fluorescence Imaging
        • Permeability: In Situ Method
        • Permeability: Sampling Method
        • Cell Culture Common Issues and Troubleshooting Tips
    • SepCon®Expand
      • Sepcon Assembly
      • Sepcon Video Protocol: Assembly
      • SepCon Gasket Silhouette File
      • SepCon Video Protocol: Wetting the membrane
      • SepCon Video Protocol: Disassembly
    • µSiM-DXExpand
      • µSIM Video Protocol: Capture of Nanoparticles
  • ImpactExpand
    • TraCe-bMPS
    • HCIC
    • LOMP
    • SiMPore
Nanomembrane Research Group
  • NRG

    Possible Model For Explaining Pinhole Formation

    ByJP Desormeaux December 11, 2007

    An important result of last weeks experiment showed that Antimony (Sb) doped substrates had no pinhole defects; however, Phosphorous doped substrates from the same batch had many very small pinholes. This agrees with a previous experiment: Antimony wafers have shown no pinhole formation. I propose a model that aims to explain:1) Why we are not…

    Read More Possible Model For Explaining Pinhole FormationContinue

  • NRG

    Production from 12.06.2007

    ByDave Fang December 10, 2007

    This week’s production included wafers of antimony (Sb) and phosphorus (P) doping. Process parameters The deposition heater was re-brazed prior to this deposition. We were concerned with the original brazing job because there were areas with “globs” of material and cracks in the solder. The new braze covers most of the surface, and although is…

    Read More Production from 12.06.2007Continue

  • NRG

    Process Flow Update

    ByJP Desormeaux December 10, 2007

    Process Summary for the week of 12/3 -12/10/2007: Simpore Process Flow.xls JP

    Read More Process Flow UpdateContinue

  • NRG

    Hydraulic Permeability Update

    ByMike H December 8, 2007

    I reran a set of hydraulic permeability tests at 16.56psi (3500RPM) hoping that this would clarify the previously collected data at the 21.63psi (4000RPM) and the 33.79psi (5000RPM) range that did not seem to agree with the trend of the other data points. As shown above this point still does not seem to be in…

    Read More Hydraulic Permeability UpdateContinue

  • NRG

    Diffusion though small pore membranes

    ByJessica Snyder December 5, 2007

    We have previously discussed how the membranes near the center of the wafer have very small pores, while as you progress outward larger pores begin to appear. I tested one of these central membranes from wafer 304 (TEM sample, position -1,0) using our standard fluorescence microscope based assay. I observed obvious rhodamine diffusion through this…

    Read More Diffusion though small pore membranesContinue

  • NRG

    Metallized membranes

    ByDave Fang December 5, 2007

    I took a closer look at some of Lingyun’s samples today, and captured some interesting TEM images. wafer 205 with 10 nm Ti @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti @ 250kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 35kx wafer 205 with 10nm Ti & 10nm Au @ 200kx The higher mag….

    Read More Metallized membranesContinue

  • NRG

    Surface Testing

    ByAnant Agrawal December 4, 2007

    Surface functionalization results

    Read More Surface TestingContinue

  • NRG

    Burst pressures for new wafers

    ByMaryna Kavalenka December 4, 2007

    The graph below shows the burst pressures for302, 303, 304, 307 wafers.

    Read More Burst pressures for new wafersContinue

  • NRG

    Production from 11.29.2007

    ByDave Fang December 3, 2007

    The objective of last week’s production was to track down the source of Cu contamination. The good news is that none of the wafers showed signs of Cu. The bad news is we are not sure why it has disappeared all of the sudden. Chris and I observed that there are particles in the well…

    Read More Production from 11.29.2007Continue

  • NRG

    A closer look at separations

    ByJessica Snyder December 3, 2007

    UPDATED 12/12/07 – Added data on albumin. In these gels, the band from beta-galactosidase appears to overlap with phosphorylase b making it difficult to determine which protein passes and which is retained. I have used Mike Bindschadler’s pore imaging software to find the pore sizes of the three membranes I have use to perform succesful…

    Read More A closer look at separationsContinue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 227 228 229 230 231 Next PageNext

© 2026 Nanomembrane Research Group - WordPress Theme by Kadence WP

0
    0
    Your Cart
    Your cart is emptyReturn to Shop
    Continue Shopping
    • Home
    • Publications
    • Membranes
      • Common Chip Formats
      • Common Membranes
      • Microslit Membranes
    • Devices
      • µSiM
        • Geometry
        • µSiM CAD Files
        • Assembly
          • Protocols.io (µSiM Assembly)
          • Instructions
          • Common Issues and Troubleshooting Tips
        • Cell Culture Protocols
          • Top Well: hCMEC/D3
          • Top Well: HUVEC
          • Bottom Channel Culturing
          • Immunocytochemistry Protocol
          • Impact of Chip Orientation on Fluorescence Imaging
          • Permeability: In Situ Method
          • Permeability: Sampling Method
          • Cell Culture Common Issues and Troubleshooting Tips
      • SepCon®
        • Sepcon Assembly
        • Sepcon Video Protocol: Assembly
        • SepCon Gasket Silhouette File
        • SepCon Video Protocol: Wetting the membrane
        • SepCon Video Protocol: Disassembly
      • µSiM-DX
        • µSIM Video Protocol: Capture of Nanoparticles
    • Impact
      • TraCe-bMPS
      • HCIC
      • LOMP
      • SiMPore